Gilbert Martin, M.D.
It is clear to all professionals working in the health field today that it is increasingly difficult to keep abreast of the medical literature. The biomedical literature is expanding at a rate that doubles every 10-15 years and increases 10-fold every 35-50 years.
For most of us, the time allotted for reading the literature is decreased as other responsibilities increase. Therefore the need for a process to select material which is interesting, pertinent, valid and applicable is important.
Although reading and reviewing material is a critical and continual part of our professional lives, the writing of a “piece of medical literature” often is not considered. Medical writing has become dull, depersonalized and not interesting. The relationship between editor and author is too formal. Fear of rejection and inadequate training in syntax and the application of the scientific method turn away individuals who do have information which should be shared by healthcare professionals. Worthwhile ideas whether presented as a “letter to the editor,” “book review,” “original article,” or “literature review” can be timely and informative.
This column will present a method of selecting and reviewing material from the medical literature and assist the individual in understanding the requirements of a medical journal and its editorial staff. Using material from the literature, we will dissect different types of articles and outline the writing and editing of an “individual piece of scientific information.”
The Book Review
As the medical literature expands, the need for interested and competent book reviewers becomes important as we depend upon the judgment of the reviewer as a guide in selecting and buying books. There are specific steps that can be taken in appraising a book. Learning the basic skills of book reviewing will increase the average reader’s ability to understand and appreciate a book. Since the book reviewer is oftentimes a specialist in the field that is being reviewed, bias and nonobjective statements may be offered. The reviewer must be honest, balanced, show enthusiasm and especially courage. Readers expect intellectual appraisal as their decision to buy and read the book can depend upon the review.
Book reviews are either DESCRIPTIVE or EVALUATIVE.
1. Descriptive review:
A. Makes book’s existence known
B. States author, publisher, price
C. Elaborates table of contents
2. Evaluative review:
A. Review material
B. Offer opinions
C. Does not assist in the decision to buy or read the book.